What was checked, and what changed?

How updates work

Daily review is scheduled for 6 a.m. Eastern, starting October 6, 2026. Active proposals and approaching implementation dates receive daily attention. The wider source register rotates across seven days. Substantive changes require source review before a new release; retrieval failures and unfinished checks remain visible here.

The maintenance register covers 262 source URLs from the stored inventory. Source monitoring does not establish complete national coverage. 2 older research records still await substantive verification and stay outside reviewed policy counts.

49 of 816 state/topic cells now have documented, bounded claim reviews. These are partial reviews, not completed statewide audits.

Oct 5, 2026 · Development review

Oregon and D.C. learning evidence narrowed; national audit remains open

Follow-up primary-source review of the three unresolved state/D.C. CS jurisdictions from the bounded learning audit.

• Added Oregon’s official statewide implementation plan as a current learning recommendation with a 2027–28 access goal; it is not treated as a universal course mandate.
• Added Oregon’s optional standards draft as Proposed and excluded it from adopted-standard counts until production-source adoption is confirmed.
• Added D.C. OSSE landing-page support evidence for Technology and Computer Science Guidance and professional learning; the linked student-facing guidance remains unavailable and no mandate is inferred.
• Reviewed CS evidence now appears in 50 of 51 state/D.C. profiles; Vermont remains the one unresolved source/adoption path in this bounded set.

Still unresolved

• Vermont agency page could not be fully retrieved; H.318 status does not establish an enacted CS requirement. No policy-absence finding.
• Oregon final optional-standards adoption status remains unresolved; the draft and expired feedback window are not presented as current law.
• D.C. linked student-facing CS guidance returned unavailable; statewide/DCPS authority and classroom delivery remain open.
• Complete state-by-topic, district census, historical and independent reviews remain unfinished. Visual browser QA is still blocked by the unavailable Sites control-browser skill.

This is a bounded manual follow-up included in the dated release; it is not a certification of national completeness or an unattended scheduled run.

Oct 5, 2026 · Development review

Learning coverage expanded; national audit remains open

Bounded review of the 12 state/D.C. jurisdictions that had no reviewed statewide CS entry. Nine yielded verified additions; three retain specific source or adoption-status gaps.

• Added 15 primary-source learning records across nine jurisdictions; reviewed CS evidence now appears in 48 of 51 state/D.C. profiles.
• Added Hawaii school-level access duties, Kansas course-or-plan duty and Missouri high-school offering requirement; preserved the difference from student graduation requirements.
• Added CS standards and integrated-standards findings, including explicit AI content in Alaska and South Dakota and AI learning recommendations in Maine and Missouri.
• Made the 12 scoped review outcomes visible in the coverage ledger and current downloads.
• Extended source monitoring to the new authorities and unresolved learning-source paths.

Still unresolved

• Oregon final optional-standards status; Vermont full agency source and H.318 disposition; DC linked guidance retrieval.
• Mississippi HB702 official final history remains unavailable; Sumner County’s full AI policy text remains unavailable. Those older records stay outside reviewed counts.
• Nationwide state/topic and district historical audits, delivery evidence and independent review remain unfinished.
• Visual browser QA is blocked because the Sites-required control-browser skill is unavailable. Source-render and consistency checks do not replace visual QA.

Included in this versioned learning-data release; these entries do not represent an unattended scheduled run.

Oct 5, 2026 · Development review

22 pending records resolved; comparisons reconciled

Revisited all 24 older pending records; substantively resolved 22 and retained two outside reviewed totals. Added two district AI-learning duties, recovered Indiana and Idaho successor rules, and added Pennsylvania’s proposal. Updated seven phone-comparison profiles and rechecked Massachusetts’s official history.

• Corrected legal scope, school implementation timing and historical status, including Alaska, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan funding, Utah council duties and Montana standards.
• Personal-device comparison now has 32 primary-text findings, 17 official-summary findings and two unresolved statewide classifications. Proposal classifications do not establish absence of other rules.
• Added Wichita and Talladega AI-learning commitments with explicit limits on what they establish about classroom delivery.
• Recovered Sumner’s October 2024 policy adoption record, removed unsupported duty claims and retained full-text review as pending.
• Added Massachusetts and Pennsylvania to the selected proposal watch; future implementation now draws from all reviewed upcoming restriction records.
• Reconciled current phone comparison, analysis, map and exports. Dated archives remain unchanged. Learning counts exclude adopted standards whose implementation timing remains unresolved.
• Expanded scheduled source coverage to include the separate device audit and learning-support registers.

Still unresolved

• Mississippi HB 702: introduced text reviewed, but official final-history retrieval remains blocked. Sumner County: adoption verified, but complete policy duties remain unverified.
• Mississippi and South Dakota statewide phone classifications remain unresolved. A failed or pending proposal does not establish policy absence.
• Some primary instruments were read from public mirrors or indexed official sections; individual records disclose those methods. No independent review is claimed.
• Complete state-by-topic, district census and matched October 2024 historical audits remain open. Published commitments do not establish delivery in every classroom.
• Visual browser QA remains blocked because the Sites preview workflow requires the unavailable control-browser skill. Source, type, rendering and consistency checks do not substitute for visual inspection.

This is a bounded claim-resolution review. A release date does not mean every source was reviewed that day, and it is not a certification of national completeness.

Oct 5, 2026 · Development review

Partial review completed

All eight watchlist sources reopened; their documented stages remain unchanged. Selected homepage survey and policy sources rechecked. Inventory-wide structural checks passed.

• Rebuilt the educator journey and repaired topic selection and shared links.
• Separated the unfinished October-to-October historical comparison from the older December-baseline artifact.
• Expanded maintenance coverage from 11 discovery URLs to a registry generated from the full stored inventory.
• Corrected a pre-existing consistency check: the full coverage index includes future, proposed and historical records; timing filters apply in the shared public model.
• Replaced stale current-download links with live exports from the shared inventory; preserved the older 230-record file as a dated archive.
• Verified the rendered homepage structure and matching map/download records across nine topic/timing views.

Still unresolved

• Complete state-by-topic and district historical audits remain open.
• Chicago AI guidebook, Alabama course-of-study PDF and Montana standards PDF could not be reopened through the web tool in this review; no new verification date assigned to those claims.
• Independent substantive review remains outstanding. Visual/browser verification was unavailable; preview requests returned an infrastructure error.
• Texas statutory pages returned their navigation shell and the Utah community-council statute returned a retrieval error; search excerpts were insufficient for a new substantive verification date.

This log records the review scope; the release is not a certification of every source or claim.